The readings this week look at the evolution of the notion
of sacraments in the Church. . Jesus
called people to” repent and believe the good news” (Mk 1:15), and he told
Nicodemus that “no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water
and Spirit” (Jn 3:5), but we don’t hear that those who followed Jesus needed to
be baptized. Only after Jesus had ascended into heaven and
the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the disciples do we hear Peter call
people to “Repent and be baptized, every one of you” (Acts2:38). So baptism comes after Jesus’ life on earth
has ended. As Leo I said, “What was visible in our
Redeemer when on earth has become operative in sacramental signs” (Johnson 4).
As far as the Eucharist is concerned, Vondey makes it clear
throughout People of Bread that “the
sharing of bead is the purest form of companionship” (195). At the Last Supper, Jesus gave the breaking
of bread a whole new dimension, “a new form of unity between God and humankind,”
which “forms the heart of its sacramental nature in the world” (195).
I don’t know when the Church began using the term
“sacrament,” but St. Augustine speaks of it as some sort of physical element
which, combined with the words proper to it spoken in faith, will cleanse the
soul (Johnson 2). In the passages cited from Augustine, he says nothing about
the number of the sacraments” James F. White notes that Augustine called almost
anything a sacrament (Johnson 4, 30-31).
Peter Lombard (12th century) names seven
sacraments. The basis for their being
included seems to be that they are practiced within the community and they
contain the power which they signify. Thomas
Aquinas (13th century) says the sacraments are necessary for
salvation and are the cause of grace. He
also states that baptism, confirmation and orders imprint a perpetual character
on the soul, and only God can institute a sacrament. (6-7, 9)
During the 16th century and the Protestant
Reformation, there is a radical shift.
Martin Luther denies that there are seven sacraments, and the main
thrust of the reformers is to accept only two sacraments, baptism and the
Lord’s Supper (12-20).
The Catholic Reformation, also in the 16th
century, is remarkable for its defensive holding on to its positions of the
past, going so far as to insist that all seven sacraments were instituted by
Jesus Christ, and to damn anyone who did not agree with them (21). It made me sad to read this.
A hundred years later the Society of
Friends rejects all external sacraments, believing that “All true
and acceptable worship to God is offered in the inward and immediate moving and
drawing of his own Spirit…” (23). They believe that both baptism and communion
of the Body and Blood of Christ are inward and spiritual.
In the modern period, there are exciting developments. Edward Schillebeeckx, in Christ, the Sacrament of the Encounter with God, sees sacraments as
“not things, but encounters of men on earth with the glorified man Jesus by way
of a visible form…. They are the visible and tangible embodiment of the
heavenly saving action of Christ”
(Johnson 26-27).
Karl Rahner sees the Church as “the primal sacrament,” and says
that sacraments are not always based on a definite, preserved statement spoken
by Jesus himself. There can be many
sacraments: “A fundamental act of the
Church in an individual’s regard, in situations that are decisive for him, an
act which truly involves the nature of the Church as the historical,
eschatological presence of redemptive grace is ipso facto a sacrament” (Johnson 29).
James F. White, a Protestant theologian, has developed a
classification of the sacraments:
Dominical
– instituted by Christ: Baptism and the
Lord’s Supper. Apostolic – continue action of the apostles: reconciliation,
healing, confirmation
Natural – marriage and burial.
Natural – marriage and burial.
What I see in this sacramental development is:
First, emergence from traditional community customs of sacred rituals following the example of Jesus; development of other sacred rituals based on the needs of the community and continuing the “intentions and actions of Jesus”; development of sacred rituals to mark key moments of the human life-cycle. None of these were rigidly structured. All made Jesus present in their everyday lives.
First, emergence from traditional community customs of sacred rituals following the example of Jesus; development of other sacred rituals based on the needs of the community and continuing the “intentions and actions of Jesus”; development of sacred rituals to mark key moments of the human life-cycle. None of these were rigidly structured. All made Jesus present in their everyday lives.
Second, analysis of
the structure of these rituals and their classification. They become more formalized and rigid. Sometimes rules could take attention away
from their purpose.
Third, return to the
roots; realization that some of the structures meant to facilitate an encounter
with God were hindering it. Work to
‘enlarge the tent’ so that God can break through everywhere, including through
feminist, liberation, Asian, African, and other local theologies, even in the
prison.