Lumen Gentium, Ch. 2 “On the People of God”
While all are
called to belong to the Catholic Church, I was struck by the inclusive language
in Chapter 2 of those who are connected to the “People of God” or the catholic
(little “c”) Church by virtue of their unity of belief, and actions that
display “love as Christ loved” even if they do not know or accept Christ (¶
13(116)). These uses of grace for the benefit of others, not self, is the
connection to The Way or salvation
through Christ. (I accept that the People of God does not include “those people
who persist in evil and desire to foster despair” (http://www.statucson.org/sites/statucson.org/files/LT%20Times%20-%20Summary%20of%20Lumen%20Gentium%20–%20Dogmatic%20Constitution%20of%20the%20Church.pdf).
I recognize that at times I, too, probably “foster despair,” although I do not
believe I “persist in evil.” The use of our gifts is fluid and inconsistent. I
believe a prayer to advocate hope and not foster despair in others is called
for in my life.)
While
participating in a recent ecumenical service, I was asked, rhetorically, I
thought at first, “Why is unity important?” I thought it was obvious that unity
of and cohesiveness in faith promotes a strength in and display of the Church
community that welcomes and invites all to Christian fellowship. This was a
thought provoking question, actually. May a relationship or connection to the
People of God be enough to gain eternal life? How can there be a unity of
belief when the primacy of the papacy (even including collegiality with the bishops
(Rausch, Towards a Truly Catholic Church,
26-7, citing LG 22, 23)) is asserted: “…within the Church particular Churches
hold a rightful place; these Churches retain their own traditions, without in
any way opposing the primacy of the Chair of Peter, which presides over the
whole assembly of charity (11*) and protects legitimate differences, while at
the same time assuring that such differences do not hinder unity but rather
contribute toward it” (¶ 13(122))? While the Roman Catholic Church no longer
claims to be the exclusive Church of Christ (LG 8), isn’t it difficult
still for other Christian denominations to dialogue with the members of the
Catholic Church that claim infallibility?
It will be
interesting to read the discussion that comes from the upcoming round of the ecumenical
Catholic-Reformed dialogue, January 28-29. I recently learned that Pope John
Paul II invited other Christian denominations to express how the papacy “could
exercise this ministry [of unity] in a way that would promote a broader unity
among all Christians. A pope for Protestants too?” Fr. John Crossin was
remarking in his article written during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.
Father Crossin is
executive director of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs
of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Fr. Rausch well
recognizes that the Catholic Church readily keeps the ability to “dialogue with
the great world religions, and thus, with all the world’s peoples,” when it
acknowledges “that non-Christians are not excluded from God’s salvific grace” (Towards, 32).
Laura,
ReplyDeleteA brief response to your question: "isn’t it difficult still for other Christian denominations to dialogue with the members of the Catholic Church that claim infallibility?"
In terms of ecumenical dialogue, evidence shows that this is taking place between Christian denominations (Catholic-Orthodox, Catholic-Lutheran, Catholic-Evangelical just recently highlighted by the work of Pope Francis), and we can assume that these other Christian communities, if they are in dialogue with the Catholic Church, are well aware of the Catholic teaching of papal infallibility. When it comes to the sheer possibility of dialogue as well as engaging authentically in its process, it is supremely important to consider, as I am sure these other Christian dialogue partners did, what is actually and concretely meant by the Catholic teaching of papal infallibility - how limited its use has actually been, at how it is a statement about God's absolute commitment to guiding the Church, not a reflection about a papal "superpower." For authentic dialogue to emerge, the most difficult thing is not this teaching, but rather the work of striving to understand one anothers' positions as fully as possible. Although it can be difficult, the commitment to this is beautiful and life-giving, I am certain.
Blessings
DZSJ